ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Rancho Viejo Middle · HemetPublic

Rancho Viejo Middle: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Rancho Viejo posts low test scores — and grade 8 tests above grade 6 here this year, by 1.8pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

985 North Cawston Avenue, 92545 (opens in new tab)·Hemet Unified·Hemet·Grades 6-8·1,040 students·89% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(951) 765-6287·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2439
% Exceeded7%17%
% Met+23%40%
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)Average · p48Average · p50
Absence35.1%18.1%
Suspension4.7%3.6%
Scope Score
24
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #1,726 statewide · #4 of 8 in Hemet Unified

Rancho Viejo Middle scores 24 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 23rd percentile of 2,177 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “23% proficient” and call it done. Rancho Viejo deserves a closer read. The school sits in Hemet, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,177 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 10th to the 23rd percentile of California middle schools since 2019.

ELAYellow(Increased)MathRed(Maintained)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 23% of students meet the standard today, above the 20% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 622%24%24%24%28%
Grade 728%31%25%28%34%
Grade 826%27%32%34%29%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 617%11%15%16%15%
Grade 716%9%13%12%17%
Grade 810%12%8%15%17%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

8%
21%
71%
Grade 6 · 29% proficient
27%
66%
Grade 7 · 34% proficient
8%
22%
70%
Grade 8 · 30% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
6.6%
State 17.2%
10.6pp below state avg
Met or exceeded
23.5%
State 40.0%
16.5pp below state avg
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)
Average
State average
The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 44 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
Chronic absenteeism
35.1%
State 18.1%
17.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
4.7%
State 3.6%
1.0pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
11.3%
State 18.0%
6.6pp below state avg

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and its two subjects part company here. It puts this school around the 38th percentile of California middle schools in reading and the 16th in math; ours, which blends the subjects, lands around the 48th. A gap that size between reading and math in one building is worth asking about directly — one year of data can't tell you whether it is the teaching, the cohort, or noise.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
Our growth measuresame cohort, G6→G8SchoolScope growth measure: 48th percentile among California middle schools.48th pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −2 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 38th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.38th pctile · −2 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −12 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 16th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.16th pctile · −12 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Rancho Viejo Middle in Hemet, 28.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Rancho Viejo Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 3.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 869 students tested.

All students at this school: 23% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 23%, district —, state 40%23%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 22%, district 24%, state 32%22% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 21%, district 24%, state 32%21% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 23%, district 26%, state 42%23% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 24%, district 27%, state 44%24% · +0 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 6%, district 6%, state 15%6% · −18 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 3%, district 4%, state 11%3% · −21 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 35%, district 36%, state 56%35% · +12 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 19%, district 19%, state 26%19% · −4 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 29%, district 31%, state 56%29% · +6 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 16%, district 35%, state 46%16% · −8 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 9%, district 14%, state 22%9% · −15 vs school

5 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.7pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +6.1pp.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Low-income students789 studentsLow-income students, reading: −3 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 789 students.−3 pts · 0 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students646 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: −4 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 646 students.−4 pts · −2 vs typical
English Only580 studentsEnglish Only, reading: −2 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 580 students.−2 pts · −2 vs typical
English Learner214 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: −4 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 214 students.−4 pts · +1 vs typical
Students with disabilities144 studentsStudents with disabilities, reading: −8 scale-score points versus expectation, against −13 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 144 students.−8 pts · +5 vs typical
Math
Low-income students788 studentsLow-income students, math: −12 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 788 students.−12 pts · −7 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students646 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −13 scale-score points versus expectation, against −6 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 646 students.−13 pts · −7 vs typical
English Only577 studentsEnglish Only, math: −10 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 577 students.−10 pts · −7 vs typical
English Learner215 studentsEnglish Learner, math: −17 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 215 students.−17 pts · −14 vs typical
Students with disabilities143 studentsStudents with disabilities, math: −23 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 143 students.−23 pts · −15 vs typical
this school typical California middle school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 1 more group is reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 35.1%, district 30.5%, state 18.1%35.1% · +17.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.7%, district —, state 3.6%4.7% · +1.0pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–637.0%
Grades 7–834.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Tahquitz HighScope 48direct feeder

The road from this school ends at Tahquitz High, which sent 20 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 17 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Tahquitz High around 2031, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 53% of Tahquitz High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

20 UC ENROLLEES (FALL 2025) · 17 AP SUBJECTS TAUGHT full record on Tahquitz High's page
Source: UC & College Board

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 22:122:1
PrincipalWilliam Prudhomme
Teaching staff49 teachers
Avg. experience10.2 years
Fully credentialed87%
First-year teachers10%
Intern / emergency permit0.4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$49,867 – $136,225
Principal salary$159,200 – $184,030
Superintendent salary$388,334

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,678, CA average $14,491$17,678 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$649 per student

$649 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,822 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction56%
Instruction support13%
Student services12%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,161 per pupil
2019$14,782 per pupil
2018$14,843 per pupil
2017$16,755 per pupil
2016$14,742 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Hispanic72.0%
District 69.7% · CA 56.1%
White12.0%
District 15.7% · CA 19.9%
Black9.6%
District 7.8% · CA 4.8%
Other5.6%
District 6.0% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.8%
District 0.8% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 89.3% (26pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$64K · CA $85K
Median home value$380K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+18% · CA 35%
ZIP population45,982
Median age41 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 15% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Rancho Viejo Middle a good middle school?

Rancho Viejo Middle has a Scope Score of 24 out of 100, placing it in the 23rd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,726 statewide. 6.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.6 percentage points below the California average of 17.2%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 6-to-8 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Rancho Viejo Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 23.5% of students at Rancho Viejo Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 6.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 16.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 6.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,940 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Rancho Viejo Middle rank in California?

Rancho Viejo Middle ranks #1,726 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 23rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Rancho Viejo Middle getting better or worse?

SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Rancho Viejo Middle that cohort is 2023 G6 → 2025 G8, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks average among California middle schools — roughly the 48th percentile, behind the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the middle Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Rancho Viejo Middle?

35.1% of students at Rancho Viejo Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.1%. The suspension rate is 4.7%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Rancho Viejo Middle compare to other schools in Hemet?

Rancho Viejo Middle scores 24/100 (23rd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,040 students. Use the schools in Hemet page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Rancho Viejo Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Rancho Viejo Middle in Hemet, 28.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Rancho Viejo Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 3.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 869 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

What high school does Rancho Viejo Middle feed into?

By attendance boundary, Rancho Viejo Middle is zoned to Tahquitz High. Tahquitz High has a Scope Score of 48 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
6.6%
↓ vs CA 17.2% · 38th pctile
Met or exceeded · 23%
23.5%
↓ vs CA 40.0% · 37th pctile
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8) · 20%
Average
↓ vs CA average · 48th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
35.1%
↓ vs CA 18.1% · 27th pctile
▲ 2.3pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
4.7%
↓ vs CA 3.6% · 46th pctile
▼ 3.8pp lower vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
11.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 36th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 63298%21%30%41%28%−18
Grade 72987%27%27%39%34%−14
Grade 83438%22%29%42%29%−17
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 63284%11%25%60%15%−20
Grade 73027%10%22%61%17%−17
Grade 83406%11%19%64%17%−15

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide3384%11%62%23%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged86928.4%−4−10
Hispanic/Latino70826.8%−5−12
Students with Disabilities1537.8%+1−9
03Nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Rancho Viejo Middle ←246.6%23.5%+1.8pp+44 pts4.7%
Monte Vista Middle2.6 mi193.8%16.9%−0.1pp7.5%
California average3917.2%40.0%+1.5pp3.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20191810#18173.8%19.7%13.8%8.4%-2.1pp
20221610#19574.2%19.2%43.2%10.5%+2.2pp
20231510#19735.3%19.5%40.6%15.7%+0.2pp
20242628#15966.5%21.4%32.9%8.5%+3.7pp
20252423#17266.6%23.5%35.1%4.7%+1.8pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female12.1%33.8%+21.7pp
Male15.5%36.8%+21.3pp
Black/African American21.3%47.5%+26.2pp
White9.1%
Hispanic/Latino12.1%35.1%+23.0pp
Two or More Races20.0%37.8%+17.8pp
Students with Disabilities20.2%46.7%+26.5pp
English Learners13.1%38.1%+25.0pp
Foster Youth7.7%38.1%+30.4pp
Homeless26.7%66.7%+40.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14.1%36.8%+22.7pp
All Students13.8%35.4%+21.6pp
11California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−2879Average−12877Moderate
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−3789Average−12788Moderate
Hispanic or Latino−4646Average−13646Moderate
English Only−2580not categorised−10577not categorised
English Learner−4214Average−17215Moderate
Students with Disabilities−8144Moderate−23143Minimal
English Learners Only−13117not categorised−16117not categorised
White+2104Average+2104Average
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+997not categorised−1698not categorised
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)−391Average−1391Moderate
Black or African American+377Average−2575Minimal
Two or More Races−235Average+135Average
Homeless Youth−2818Minimal−218Average

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/rancho-viejo-middle-6962"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Rancho Viejo Middle — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,177 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction