ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Malibu Middle · Malibu

Malibu Middle: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Malibu posts 60% meeting the standard, and 28.1% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

2022–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5643
% Exceeded28%17%
% Met+60%39%
Growth-6.1+1.5
Absence20.1%18.5%
Suspension1.2%3.7%
Scope Score
56
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #422 statewide · #3 of 4 in Santa Monica-Malibu Unified

Malibu Middle scores 56 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 81st percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “60% proficient” and call it done. Malibu deserves a closer read. It sits at the 81st percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Malibu's low-income kids hit 61.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has held the 81st-percentile line every tested year since 2022.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade2022202320242025
Grade 677%58%75%68%
Grade 776%63%68%70%
Grade 880%65%64%63%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade2022202320242025
Grade 654%48%52%56%
Grade 749%57%59%55%
Grade 851%47%43%49%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

32%
36%
32%
Grade 6 · 68% proficient
25%
45%
30%
Grade 7 · 70% proficient
22%
40%
38%
Grade 8 · 62% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 9.7pp across grades; the floor slips 5.2pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

61.5%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Malibu's most underrated number

61.5% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Malibu low-income: 61.5%State low-income: 38.2%

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
28.1%
State 16.8%
11.3pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-6.1pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
60.1%
State 39.3%
20.8pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
20.1%
State 18.5%
1.6pp above state avg
Suspension rate
1.2%
State 3.7%
2.4pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Malibu Middle in Malibu, 61.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 53.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Malibu Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 8.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (41.0% Math proficient); White students (68.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 4.1 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 39 students tested.

All students at this school: 60% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 60%, district —, state 39%60%
WhiteWhite: this school 61%, district 76%, state 56%61% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 56%, district 65%, state 42%56% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 65%, district 68%, state 44%65% · +5 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 51%, district 45%, state 32%51% · −9 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 42%, district 49%, state 32%42% · −17 vs school

6 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 12.2pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -5.0pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 20.1%, district 18.4%, state 18.5%20.1% · +1.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.2%, district —, state 3.7%1.2% · −2.4pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–619.5%
Grades 7–820.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 14:1, district 19:114:1
Teaching staff24 teachers
Avg. experience11.9 years
Fully credentialed83%
First-year teachers8%
Intern / emergency permit1.8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$62,469 – $125,576
Principal salary$157,428 – $180,392
Superintendent salary$297,412

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,123, CA average $14,815$17,123 · district average
District current expense · FY 2024–25$25,939 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance13%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$17,123 per pupil
2019$15,913 per pupil
2018$16,566 per pupil
2017$15,621 per pupil
2016$15,269 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White82.0%
District 47.9% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic10.6%
District 29.8% · CA 56.1%
Asian3.5%
District 7.4% · CA 10.2%
Black1.9%
District 6.5% · CA 4.8%
Other1.9%
District 8.4% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 20.7% (43pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$197K · CA $85K
Median home value$2.00M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+69% · CA 35%
ZIP population15,918
Median age52 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 256 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 56% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Malibu Middle a good middle school?

Malibu Middle has a Scope Score of 56 out of 100, placing it in the 81st percentile of California middle schools and ranked #422 statewide. 28.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 11.3 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Malibu Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 60.1% of students at Malibu Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 28.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 32.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 28.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 490 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Malibu Middle rank in California?

Malibu Middle ranks #422 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 81st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Malibu Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Malibu Middle decreases by 6.1 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Malibu Middle?

20.1% of students at Malibu Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 1.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Malibu Middle compare to other schools in Malibu?

Malibu Middle scores 56/100 (81st percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 256 students. Use the schools in Malibu page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Malibu Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Malibu Middle in Malibu, 61.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 53.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Malibu Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 8.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (41.0% Math proficient); White students (68.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 4.1 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 39 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
28.1%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 62th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-6.1pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 53th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
60.1%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 67th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
20.1%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 48th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.2%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 60th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 67532%36%24%8%68%+21
Grade 77625%45%16%14%70%+22
Grade 89422%40%26%12%63%+17
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 67533%23%29%15%56%+21
Grade 77630%25%26%18%55%+21
Grade 89426%23%31%20%49%+17
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/119420%36%39%4%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged3961.5%+8+23
White19868.7%−13+7
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Malibu Middle ←5628.1%60.1%−6.11.2%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20225886#29728.7%64.6%25.6%3.8%+0.3pp
20235984#35726.4%56.5%20.9%3.0%+3.3pp
20245583#38728.8%60.0%14.6%2.0%-9.8pp
20255681#42228.1%60.1%20.1%1.2%-6.1pp
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female21.3%
Male19.1%
Hispanic/Latino27.6%
Students with Disabilities32.4%
English Learners25.0%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21.0%
All Students20.2%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction