ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Kernville Elementary · KernvillePublic

Kernville Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Kernville posts 33% meeting the standard and 11.5% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

13550 Sierra Way, 93238 (opens in new tab)·Kernville Union Elementary·Kernville·Grades TK-5·105 students·78% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(760) 376-2249·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2839
% Exceeded12%21%
% Met+33%43%
Growth
Absence23.9%17.9%
Suspension1.7%1.6%
Scope Score
28
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #4,079 statewide

Kernville Elementary scores 28 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 29th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “33% proficient” and call it done. Kernville deserves a closer read. The school sits in Kernville, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 39th to the 29th percentile since 2019.

ELAYellow(Increased)MathOrange(Declined)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 33% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 353%61%40%38%44%
Grade 432%42%63%37%28%
Grade 532%67%48%44%47%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 337%61%50%19%44%
Grade 425%43%67%42%11%
Grade 519%27%35%33%27%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

19%
25%
56%
Grade 3 · 44% proficient
11%
17%
72%
Grade 4 · 28% proficient
13%
33%
54%
Grade 5 · 46% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 5.4pp across grades; the floor rises 2.9pp. The state average rises 4.6pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
11.5%
State 21.3%
9.8pp below state avg
Met or exceeded
33.3%
State 42.7%
9.4pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
23.9%
State 17.9%
6.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
1.7%
State 1.6%
0.1pp above state avg
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)
-7.1pp
State -2.9pp
No same-cohort record for this school, so growth is left out of its Scope Score altogether and the other measures carry more of the weight. The number here is this year's grade 3 against this year's grade 5 — different children, not a cohort followed over time. Compared against the state's own grade gap, which is the only fair reading of it.

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well below the middle of California elementary schools in reading, and the 6th in math. We show it; we don't score it.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −4 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 31st percentile of 7,519 reported schools.31st pctile · −4 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −19 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 6th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.6th pctile · −19 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Kernville Elementary in Kernville, 30.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Kernville Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.3% Math proficient); White students (29.2% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 30 students tested.

All students at this school: 33% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 33%, district —, state 43%33%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 27%, district 20%, state 32%27% · −6 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 25%, district 24%, state 56%25% · −8 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 23%, district 27%, state 44%23% · −10 vs school

8 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
English Only30 studentsEnglish Only, reading: −3 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 30 students.−3 pts · −6 vs typical
Math
English Only30 studentsEnglish Only, math: −20 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 30 students.−20 pts · −21 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 2 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 23.9%, district 32.4%, state 17.9%23.9% · +6.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.7%, district —, state 1.6%1.7% · +0.1pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (38.1% vs 20.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–620.0%
TK/K38.1%

Where the path goes

The path below is estimated from nearby schools in the same district — scores shown for each next step.

Estimated K-12 Path
Elementary
Kernville Elementary
28
This school

Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 21:126:1
Teaching staff9 teachers
Avg. experience17.4 years
Fully credentialed100%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$53,494 – $100,162
Principal salaryFrom $137,349
Superintendent salary$183,762

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $23,374, CA average $14,491$23,374 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,199 per student

$1,199 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$25,876 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction48%
Instruction support8%
Student services23%
Administration9%
Buildings & maintenance11%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,815 per pupil
2019$15,133 per pupil
2018$14,255 per pupil
2017$12,920 per pupil
2016$12,096 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
White66.7%
District 68.2% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic28.6%
District 24.7% · CA 56.1%
Other4.8%
District 4.8% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 78.1% (14pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$50K · CA $85K
Median home value$409K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+54% · CA 35%
ZIP population887
Median age66 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 105 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 47% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kernville Elementary a good elementary school?

Kernville Elementary has a Scope Score of 28 out of 100, placing it in the 29th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,079 statewide. 11.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 9.8 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Kernville Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 33.3% of students at Kernville Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 11.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 11.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 98 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Kernville Elementary rank in California?

Kernville Elementary ranks #4,079 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 29th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Kernville Elementary?

23.9% of students at Kernville Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.7%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Kernville Elementary compare to other schools in Kernville?

Kernville Elementary scores 28/100 (29th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 105 students. Use the schools in Kernville page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Kernville Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Kernville Elementary in Kernville, 30.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Kernville Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.3% Math proficient); White students (29.2% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 30 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
11.5%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 41th pctile
Met or exceeded · 23%
33.3%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 43th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
23.9%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 40th pctile
▼ 3.5pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
1.7%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 49th pctile
▲ 1.3pp higher vs 2024
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students) · not scored
-7.1pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31619%25%25%31%44%+1
Grade 41811%17%39%33%28%−17
Grade 51513%33%33%20%47%−1
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31613%31%19%38%44%−2
Grade 4180%11%67%22%11%−30
Grade 51513%13%27%47%27%−8

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide157%40%47%7%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged3030.0%+3−8
White2429.2%−3−33
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = the same students tracked across grades, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Kernville Elementary ←2811.5%33.3%−7.1pp1.7%
California average3921.3%42.7%−2.9pp1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20193239#334116.0%32.8%12.9%0.9%-19.3pp
20224672#160228.7%50.1%47.7%0.8%-14.4pp
20233860#229318.4%50.3%46.5%0.4%-3.7pp
20243341#340513.8%35.5%27.4%0.4%+10.8pp
20252829#407911.5%33.3%23.9%1.7%-7.1pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.7%28.3%+17.6pp
Male17.2%23.3%+6.1pp
Hispanic/Latino29.6%20.0%-9.6pp
Students with Disabilities20.0%23.1%+3.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16.8%32.2%+15.4pp
All Students13.4%25.7%+12.3pp
11California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−430Average−1930Moderate
English Only−330not categorised−2030not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−622Moderate−1822Moderate
White+119Average−1819Moderate

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/kernville-elementary-9641"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Kernville Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction