Schools in 93212 — Corcoran, California
93212 has 3 ranked schools averaging a Scope Score of 31.2 — 12.6 points below the California state average of 43.8. Scores range from 15.7 to 54.1, a 38.4-point spread.
How 93212 schools perform
The top-ranked school is Corcoran High with a Scope Score of 54 and 25.7% of students exceeding standard.
Declining trajectory: Average proficiency drops by 3.0 percentage points from grade 3 to grade 5 across 93212. This pattern in test scores may reflect a variety of factors and is worth examining school by school.
Chronic absenteeism across 93212 averages 30.3%, below the state average of 18.1%. This elevated rate may indicate systemic attendance challenges in the area.
How 93212 compares to nearby zip codes
All schools in 93212
| # | School | Score | County | Exceeded | Met+ | Absent | Susp. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corcoran High Corcoran Joint Unified Building Momentum | 54 | Kings | 25.7% | 58.8% | 19.8% | 8.2% |
| 2 | John Muir Middle Corcoran Joint Unified Building Momentum | 24 | Kings | 4.9% | 21.9% | 21.6% | 10.1% |
| 3 | Kings Lake Education Center Corcoran Joint Unified Building Momentum | 16 | Kings | 0.0% | 3.9% | 49.6% | 6.5% |
Schools in 93212 on the map
Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2024-25 · Methodology
Scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data, not official CDE ratings. They represent one way of interpreting test results and should not be the sole basis for school decisions.
What Scope Scores can't tell you about 93212
- Class sizes and student-teacher interaction quality
- Quality of arts, music, athletics, and enrichment programs
- Teacher experience, turnover, and professional development
- Campus safety, bullying climate, and social-emotional support
- Parent and community engagement levels
- Quality of special education and gifted programs
- How school zones and enrollment boundaries affect access
Scope Scores measure academic performance and school climate using public data. They are one lens among many. Full methodology