ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Developing
44/100
Developing — 58th percentile statewide
#2,204 of 5,230 CA elementary schools
↓ 16.5 pts since 2019
🚀 Growth Engine

A growth engine — students gain measurably more here than at peer schools. Additional funding is translating into measurable improvement

School Climate
70% of students attend consistently
Chronic absenteeism: 30.1% (state avg: 18.1%)
"Attend consistently" means missing ≤10% of school days (the chronic absenteeism threshold).
Moderate suspension rate
4.0% suspension rate (state avg: 1.7%)
Share of students who received at least one suspension during the year.
Source: California Dept. of Education, 2024–25See breakdown by student group →

What the numbers actually mean

Most rating sites report "43% proficient" and stop there. We think that number deserves more context — here's what we found when we looked deeper:

21.9% of students exceeded standard? Level 4 on California's CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment — the state defines four levels: Not Met, Nearly Met, Met, and Exceeded. while 21.1% met it. That exceeded rate is near the state average of 21.6%. That's 6.4 points above the Sierra Sands Unified district average of 15.5%. The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

Richmond Elementary
22%
21%
California average
22%
21%
ExceededMet onlyBelow

We tracked the same cohort across years (2023 G3 → 2025 G5): students gained 99 scale score points? Pseudo-cohort tracking: we compare this school's G3 class from a prior year to the G5 class in the current year. Same school, same cohort aged forward. Uses SBAC scale scores designed for cross-year comparison., suggesting this school is adding measurable value over time.

SchoolScope cohort tracking · Same cohort tracked across years using SBAC scale scores — stronger than single-year cross-grade comparison

Chronic absenteeism? Missing 10%+ of enrolled school days. This is an official California Dashboard accountability indicator. is 30.1%, above the state average of 18.1%.

Data you won't find on other sites: School-level per-pupil spending (not just district averages) · Current-year 2025 data direct from CDE · The exceeded vs. met split that most rating sites collapse into one number

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters → · Scope Score is SchoolScope's analysis of CDE data — not an official CDE rating. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

No single score captures a school. This is a starting point — visit, ask questions, trust your instincts.

What this score doesn't capture
  • — Teaching quality, classroom culture, and how teachers connect with students
  • — Arts, athletics, extracurriculars, and enrichment programs
  • — How well the school serves students with IEPs or gifted learners
  • — Parent community engagement and satisfaction
  • — Whether the curriculum aligns with your family's values

Most of our data is updated once per year and may reflect the prior school year.


Before you visit
Questions worth asking and signals worth checking
What to verify
Chronic absenteeism at 30.1% — 12.0 points above state average. High absenteeism often reflects community stress or disengagement, not just individual behavior.
Who this school is great for
Families prioritizing upward trajectory — proficiency improves 14.9pp G3→G5
Worth checking: Families sensitive to attendance culture — absenteeism is 12.0pp above state average
These reflect data patterns, not guarantees. Your child's experience will depend on their teacher, grade, and classroom — things no score captures.

Score Factors
Academic Performance
Exceeded standard: 21.9%
0.3pp above state avg (state avg 21.6%)
43% weight

Exceeded rate gets the highest weight because it separates schools that clear the bar from those that raise it.

Limitation: Reflects tested students only — opt-out rates are not published by CDE.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Met or exceeded: 43.0%
0.1pp above state avg (state avg 42.9%)
22% weight

Overall proficiency provides the broadest measure of academic achievement.

Limitation: Combines ‘met’ and ‘exceeded’ — the gap between them matters more than either alone.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Growth (G3→G5): +14.9pp
Scores improve across grades (state avg -3.0pp)
15% weight

Growth measures what the school adds, not what families bring. When available, we track the same cohort across years for a stronger signal.

Limitation: Cohort tracking is school-level (not individual students) — transfers and demographic shifts can affect results. Falls back to cross-sectional comparison when historical data is unavailable.

SchoolScope derived
School Climate
EL proficiency (ELPAC): 25.0%
8.2pp above state avg (state avg 16.8%)
5% weight

ELPAC Level 4 measures how well a school develops English proficiency — a school-quality signal for its EL population.

Limitation: Only available for schools with English Learner students. Weight redistributes to other dimensions when not applicable.

CDE ELPAC 2025
Holding back
Chronic absenteeism: 30.1%
12.0pp above state avg (state avg 18.1%)
10% weight

Absenteeism reflects school culture and family engagement — an official CA Dashboard accountability indicator.

Limitation: 10% threshold is the same for all schools regardless of demographics or geography.

CDE Attendance 2025
Suspension rate: 4.0%
2.3pp above state avg (state avg 1.7%)
5% weight

Low suspension rates correlate with positive school culture and restorative practices.

Limitation: Schools may differ in reporting practices — some underreport to improve metrics.

CDE Discipline 2025
We make judgment calls about what matters. We believe exceeded scores reveal more than proficiency alone, and that growth matters more than raw test results. Reasonable people could weight these differently — and that's fine. The factors above show exactly what we weighted and why, so you can decide where you agree and where you'd adjust. The elementary Scope Score uses 6 dimensions. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

The Scope Score emphasizes academic performance. It weights test proficiency, the exceeded-vs-met gap, and growth trajectory most heavily. If your family prioritizes arts, athletics, school culture, or teaching philosophy, this score captures some of that indirectly (through absenteeism and suspension) but not all of it. Different families should weight these dimensions differently — the score factors above let you see exactly what drives this number.

How to use this
  • Use for long-term academic patterns, not this week's classroom experience
  • Verify with a recent visit — scores can't capture a school mid-transformation
  • Combine with local context — talk to parents, attend a school board meeting, trust your gut

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic32.1%
White46.4%
Asian1.3%
Black10.1%
Other10.1%
GenderFemale 46.4%Male 53.6%
Resources & Access
Enrollment
377
103 below CA avg (~480)
Free/Reduced Lunch
50%
14pp below CA avg (64%)
Student-Teacher Ratio
17:1
4 fewer students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$16,541
District avg: $13,508 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
25.0% Level 4
Share of English Learners reaching full proficiency
Teacher Salary Range
$50,189 – $114,358
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At Richmond Elementary in Ridgecrest, 37.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Richmond Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (33.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 101 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Absenteeism · Homeless+21.6pp
51.7% vs 30.1% overall · n=29
Suspension · Black+9.6pp
13.6% vs 4.0% overall · n=44
ELA · Disabilities−26.7pp
22.2% vs 48.9% overall · n=18
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · Hispanic−8.4pp
14.9% vs 23.3% overall · n=69
Math · Disabilities−20.7pp
16.7% vs 37.4% overall · n=18
Math Exceeded · Disabilities−9.7pp
11.1% vs 20.8% overall · n=18

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income103 tested
ELA 37.6%·Math 28.2%· +7.5pp vs district
Hispanic69 tested
ELA 33.3%·Math 26.1%· +0.7pp vs district
White64 tested
ELA 67.7%·Math 54.7%· +19.9pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 22.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.8pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 59%Support 38%Other 3%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$82K
$3K below CA median
Median Home Value
$223K
$436K below CA median
Bachelor's+
32%
3pp below CA avg
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
9.1 years avg experience
23 teachers · 22% first-year
Teacher Credentials
68% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

5-year trend

6144'19'22'23'24'25
↓ 16.5 points since 2019
Rank: #1722 → #2622 → #2579 → #2953 → #2204Exceeded: 27% → 15% → 18% → 16% → 22%
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · No testing 2020–21 (COVID) · Scope Score based on CAASPP, absenteeism & suspension data

How Richmond Elementary compares

Richmond Elementary vs. California averages — 2025 CAASPP data
MetricThis schoolCA avg
Exceeded Standard21.9%21.6%
Met or Exceeded43.0%42.9%
Chronic Absenteeism30.1%18.1%
Suspension Rate4.0%1.7%
Cohort GrowthStrongAverage

Source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025 · Analyzed by SchoolScope

Grade trajectory

How proficiency compares across grade levels this year (different students, same test year)

ELA Trajectory
42.9%63.3%G3G4G5
Math Trajectory
35.6%45%G3G4G5

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
3rd5619.6%23.2%12.5%44.6%42.9%
4th5020.0%20.0%20.0%40.0%40.0%
5th6030.0%33.3%20.0%16.7%63.3%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
3rd5916.9%18.6%32.2%32.2%35.6%
4th5111.8%19.6%35.3%33.3%31.4%
5th6033.3%11.7%23.3%31.7%45.0%

Science scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
5th5923.7%25.4%37.3%13.6%49.1%

59 students tested · CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually like ELA/Math. Not included in the Scope Score. · Data source: CDE CAST 2025

Note: The primary zoned middle school (Murray Middle, score 20) scores 24 points lower than this school. You may want to explore charter or magnet options for middle school.
K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Richmond Elementary
44/100
This school
High School

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Schools nearby

Frequently asked questions

Is Richmond Elementary a good elementary school?
Richmond Elementary has a Scope Score of 44 out of 100, placing it in the 58th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,204 statewide. 21.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.6%. The Scope Score weights five dimensions: the exceeded-vs-met split (45%), proficiency (25%), grade-level growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Richmond Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 43.0% of students at Richmond Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 21.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 21.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 336 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Richmond Elementary rank in California?
Richmond Elementary ranks #2,204 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 58th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Richmond Elementary getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Richmond Elementary increases by 14.9 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Richmond Elementary?
30.1% of students at Richmond Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.1%. The suspension rate is 4.0%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Richmond Elementary compare to other schools in Ridgecrest?
Richmond Elementary scores 44/100 (58th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 377 students. Use the schools in Ridgecrest page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Richmond Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Richmond Elementary in Ridgecrest, 37.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Richmond Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (33.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 101 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

See something that doesn’t look right?

Report a data issue

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog