ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

La Cumbre Junior High

Grades 7-82024–25 data
Santa Barbara UnifiedSanta Barbara, Santa Barbara County93101
📍 2255 Modoc Road📞 (805) 687-0761🌐 Website
Developing
36/100
Developing — 47th percentile statewide
#908 of 1,714 CA middle schools
↓ 0.8 pts since 2023
🌱 Building Momentum

Every school has strengths the data doesn’t fully capture. Visit and see for yourself. Resources alone aren't driving results yet — deeper challenges may be at play

School Climate
77% of students attend consistently
Chronic absenteeism: 23.2% (state avg: 19.1%)
"Attend consistently" means missing ≤10% of school days (the chronic absenteeism threshold).
Moderate suspension rate
2.6% suspension rate (state avg: 4.2%)
Share of students who received at least one suspension during the year.
Source: California Dept. of Education, 2024–25See breakdown by student group →

What the numbers actually mean

Most rating sites report "38% proficient" and stop there. We think that number deserves more context — here's what we found when we looked deeper:

13.1% of students exceeded standard? Level 4 on California's CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment — the state defines four levels: Not Met, Nearly Met, Met, and Exceeded. while 25.2% met it. That exceeded rate is 4.2 points below the state average of 17.3%. That's 6.1 points below the Santa Barbara Unified district average of 19.2%. The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

CDE CAASPP 2025
La Cumbre Junior High
13%
25%
California average
17%
22%
ExceededMet onlyBelow

California's Dashboard shows ELA performance increased significantly and Math increased significantly year-over-year. 17.8% of English learners reached Level 4 (Well Developed) on ELPAC.

Chronic absenteeism? Missing 10%+ of enrolled school days. This is an official California Dashboard accountability indicator. is 23.2%, above the state average of 19.1%.

CDE Attendance 2025

Data you won't find on other sites: School-level per-pupil spending (not just district averages) · Current-year 2025 data direct from CDE · The exceeded vs. met split that most rating sites collapse into one number

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters → · Scope Score is SchoolScope's analysis of CDE data — not an official CDE rating. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

No single score captures a school. This is a starting point — visit, ask questions, trust your instincts.

▸ What this score doesn't capture
  • — Teaching quality, classroom culture, and how teachers connect with students
  • — Arts, athletics, extracurriculars, and enrichment programs
  • — How well the school serves students with IEPs or gifted learners
  • — Parent community engagement and satisfaction
  • — Whether the curriculum aligns with your family's values
  • — Growth data unavailable for this school — the score overweights proficiency, which tends to correlate with household income

Most of our data is updated once per year and may reflect the prior school year.

Before you visit
Questions worth asking and signals worth checking
Who this school is great for
✓Families who value small community feel and personal attention
△Worth checking: Families wanting top-end academic rigor — more students meet the bar (25%) than exceed it (13%); Families sensitive to attendance culture — absenteeism is 4.1pp above state average
These reflect data patterns, not guarantees. Your child's experience will depend on their teacher, grade, and classroom — things no score captures.
Score Factors
Academic Performance
Holding back
▼Exceeded standard: 13.1%
4.2pp below state avg (state avg 17.3%)
43% weight

Exceeded rate gets the highest weight because it separates schools that clear the bar from those that raise it.

Limitation: Reflects tested students only — opt-out rates are not published by CDE.

CDE CAASPP 2025
▼Met or exceeded: 38.3%
1.2pp below state avg (state avg 39.5%)
22% weight

Overall proficiency provides the broadest measure of academic achievement.

Limitation: Combines ‘met’ and ‘exceeded’ — the gap between them matters more than either alone.

CDE CAASPP 2025
School Climate
✓Suspension rate: 2.6%
1.7pp below state avg (state avg 4.2%)
5% weight

Low suspension rates correlate with positive school culture and restorative practices.

Limitation: Schools may differ in reporting practices — some underreport to improve metrics.

CDE Discipline 2025
✓EL proficiency (ELPAC): 17.8%
1.0pp above state avg (state avg 16.8%)
5% weight

ELPAC Level 4 measures how well a school develops English proficiency — a school-quality signal for its EL population.

Limitation: Only available for schools with English Learner students. Weight redistributes to other dimensions when not applicable.

CDE ELPAC 2025
Holding back
▼Chronic absenteeism: 23.2%
4.1pp above state avg (state avg 19.1%)
10% weight

Absenteeism reflects school culture and family engagement — an official CA Dashboard accountability indicator.

Limitation: 10% threshold is the same for all schools regardless of demographics or geography.

CDE Attendance 2025
We make judgment calls about what matters. We believe exceeded scores reveal more than proficiency alone, and that growth matters more than raw test results. Reasonable people could weight these differently — and that's fine. The factors above show exactly what we weighted and why, so you can decide where you agree and where you'd adjust. The middle school Scope Score uses 5 dimensions. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

The Scope Score emphasizes academic performance. It weights test proficiency, the exceeded-vs-met gap, and growth trajectory most heavily. If your family prioritizes arts, athletics, school culture, or teaching philosophy, this score captures some of that indirectly (through absenteeism and suspension) but not all of it. Different families should weight these dimensions differently — the score factors above let you see exactly what drives this number.

How to use this
  • –Use for long-term academic patterns, not this week's classroom experience
  • –Verify with a recent visit — scores can't capture a school mid-transformation
  • –Combine with local context — talk to parents, attend a school board meeting, trust your gut
Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic90.4%
White7.1%
Asian0.9%
Black0.7%
Other0.9%
GenderFemale 41.6%Male 58.4%
Resources & Access
Enrollment
450
410 below CA avg (~860)
Free/Reduced Lunch
90%
26pp above CA avg (64%)
Student-Teacher Ratio
16:1
5 fewer students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$18,504
District avg: $14,447 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
17.8% Level 4
Share of English Learners reaching full proficiency
Teacher Salary Range
$64,099 – $121,627
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At La Cumbre Junior High in Santa Barbara, 38.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. La Cumbre Junior High outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 39.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 353 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Absenteeism · Disabilities+3.9pp
27.1% vs 23.2% overall · n=85
ELA · English Learner−39.3pp
2.9% vs 42.3% overall · n=37
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · English Learner−9.1pp
0.0% vs 9.1% overall · n=37
Math · English Learner−28.4pp
6.0% vs 34.4% overall · n=50
Math Exceeded · English Learner−17.3pp
0.0% vs 17.3% overall · n=50

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income359 tested
ELA 38.9%·Math 31.8%· +0.9pp vs district
Hispanic369 tested
ELA 39.0%·Math 31.7%· +1.2pp vs district
Disabilities70 tested
ELA 18.6%·Math 17.4%· -0.8pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 56%Support 40%Other 4%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$76K
$9K below CA median
Median Home Value
$1.04M
$378K above CA median
Bachelor's+
41%
6pp above CA avg
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
12.0 years avg experience
26 teachers · 12% second-year
Teacher Credentials
68% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

2-year trend

3736'23'25
Stable (±0.8)
Rank: #1125 → #908Exceeded: 8% → 13%
2023 · 2025 · Scope Score based on CAASPP, absenteeism & suspension data

How La Cumbre Junior High compares

La Cumbre Junior High vs. California averages — 2025 CAASPP data
MetricThis schoolCA avg
Exceeded Standard13.1%17.3%
Met or Exceeded38.3%39.5%
Chronic Absenteeism23.2%19.1%
Suspension Rate2.6%4.2%

Source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025 · Analyzed by SchoolScope

Grade trajectory

How proficiency compares across grade levels this year (different students, same test year)

ELA Trajectory
45.7%39.1%G7G8
Math Trajectory
28.6%39.6%G7G8

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th0—————
7th1758.6%37.1%24.6%29.7%45.7%
8th2309.6%29.6%30.4%30.4%39.1%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th0—————
7th17813.5%15.2%30.3%41.0%28.6%
8th23520.9%18.7%19.1%41.3%39.6%

Science scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
8th2356.8%17.9%57.9%17.4%24.7%

235 students tested · CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually like ELA/Math. Not included in the Scope Score. · Data source: CDE CAST 2025

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Schools nearby

A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means

Frequently asked questions

Is La Cumbre Junior High a good middle school?
La Cumbre Junior High has a Scope Score of 36 out of 100, placing it in the 47th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #908 statewide. 13.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 4.2 percentage points below the California average of 17.3%. The Scope Score weights five dimensions: the exceeded-vs-met split (45%), proficiency (25%), grade-level growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are La Cumbre Junior High's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 38.3% of students at La Cumbre Junior High met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 13.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.2% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 13.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 818 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does La Cumbre Junior High rank in California?
La Cumbre Junior High ranks #908 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 47th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at La Cumbre Junior High?
23.2% of students at La Cumbre Junior High are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 19.1%. The suspension rate is 2.6%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does La Cumbre Junior High compare to other schools in Santa Barbara?
La Cumbre Junior High scores 36/100 (47th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 450 students. Use the schools in Santa Barbara page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.
How does La Cumbre Junior High serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At La Cumbre Junior High in Santa Barbara, 38.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. La Cumbre Junior High outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 39.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 353 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
← Browse all schoolsDownload CSV

See something that doesn’t look right?

Report a data issue

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog