ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Ida Jew Academies

Grades K-8Charter2024–25 data
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
Developing
30/100
Developing — 23rd percentile statewide
#4,036 of 5,230 CA elementary schools
↓ 14.4 pts since 2019
🌱 Building Momentum

Every school has strengths the data doesn’t fully capture. Visit and see for yourself. Resources alone aren't driving results yet — deeper challenges may be at play

School Climate
82% of students attend consistently
Chronic absenteeism: 17.7% (state avg: 18.1%)
"Attend consistently" means missing ≤10% of school days (the chronic absenteeism threshold).
Minimal suspensions
1.2% suspension rate (state avg: 1.7%)
Share of students who received at least one suspension during the year.
Source: California Dept. of Education, 2024–25See breakdown by student group →

What the numbers actually mean

Most rating sites report "23% proficient" and stop there. We think that number deserves more context — here's what we found when we looked deeper:

8.7% of students exceeded standard? Level 4 on California's CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment — the state defines four levels: Not Met, Nearly Met, Met, and Exceeded. while 14.0% met it. That exceeded rate is 12.9 points below the state average of 21.6%. That's near the Mount Pleasant Elementary district average of 8.9%. The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

Ida Jew Academies
9%
14%
California average
22%
21%
ExceededMet onlyBelow

We tracked the same cohort across years (2023 G3 → 2025 G5): students gained 66 scale score points? Pseudo-cohort tracking: we compare this school's G3 class from a prior year to the G5 class in the current year. Same school, same cohort aged forward. Uses SBAC scale scores designed for cross-year comparison., suggesting this school is adding measurable value over time.

SchoolScope cohort tracking · Same cohort tracked across years using SBAC scale scores — stronger than single-year cross-grade comparison

Chronic absenteeism? Missing 10%+ of enrolled school days. This is an official California Dashboard accountability indicator. is 17.7%, better than the state average of 18.1%.

Data you won't find on other sites: School-level per-pupil spending (not just district averages) · Current-year 2025 data direct from CDE · The exceeded vs. met split that most rating sites collapse into one number

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters → · Scope Score is SchoolScope's analysis of CDE data — not an official CDE rating. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

No single score captures a school. This is a starting point — visit, ask questions, trust your instincts.

What this score doesn't capture
  • — Teaching quality, classroom culture, and how teachers connect with students
  • — Arts, athletics, extracurriculars, and enrichment programs
  • — How well the school serves students with IEPs or gifted learners
  • — Parent community engagement and satisfaction
  • — Whether the curriculum aligns with your family's values

Most of our data is updated once per year and may reflect the prior school year.


Before you visit
Questions worth asking and signals worth checking
Who this school is great for
Families looking for a low-discipline-incident environment
Worth checking: Families wanting top-end academic rigor — more students meet the bar (14%) than exceed it (9%); Students needing sustained momentum — proficiency dips between grades
These reflect data patterns, not guarantees. Your child's experience will depend on their teacher, grade, and classroom — things no score captures.

Score Factors
Academic Performance
Holding back
Exceeded standard: 8.7%
12.9pp below state avg (state avg 21.6%)
43% weight

Exceeded rate gets the highest weight because it separates schools that clear the bar from those that raise it.

Limitation: Reflects tested students only — opt-out rates are not published by CDE.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Met or exceeded: 22.7%
20.2pp below state avg (state avg 42.9%)
22% weight

Overall proficiency provides the broadest measure of academic achievement.

Limitation: Combines ‘met’ and ‘exceeded’ — the gap between them matters more than either alone.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Growth (G3→G5): -10.2pp
Scores decline across grades (state avg -3.0pp)
15% weight

Growth measures what the school adds, not what families bring. When available, we track the same cohort across years for a stronger signal.

Limitation: Cohort tracking is school-level (not individual students) — transfers and demographic shifts can affect results. Falls back to cross-sectional comparison when historical data is unavailable.

SchoolScope derived
School Climate
Chronic absenteeism: 17.7%
0.5pp below state avg (state avg 18.1%)
10% weight

Absenteeism reflects school culture and family engagement — an official CA Dashboard accountability indicator.

Limitation: 10% threshold is the same for all schools regardless of demographics or geography.

CDE Attendance 2025
Suspension rate: 1.2%
0.5pp below state avg (state avg 1.7%)
5% weight

Low suspension rates correlate with positive school culture and restorative practices.

Limitation: Schools may differ in reporting practices — some underreport to improve metrics.

CDE Discipline 2025
We make judgment calls about what matters. We believe exceeded scores reveal more than proficiency alone, and that growth matters more than raw test results. Reasonable people could weight these differently — and that's fine. The factors above show exactly what we weighted and why, so you can decide where you agree and where you'd adjust. The elementary Scope Score uses 5 dimensions. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

The Scope Score emphasizes academic performance. It weights test proficiency, the exceeded-vs-met gap, and growth trajectory most heavily. If your family prioritizes arts, athletics, school culture, or teaching philosophy, this score captures some of that indirectly (through absenteeism and suspension) but not all of it. Different families should weight these dimensions differently — the score factors above let you see exactly what drives this number.

How to use this
  • Use for long-term academic patterns, not this week's classroom experience
  • Verify with a recent visit — scores can't capture a school mid-transformation
  • Combine with local context — talk to parents, attend a school board meeting, trust your gut

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic90.7%
White0.2%
Asian4.2%
Black1.2%
Other3.7%
GenderFemale 52.0%Male 48.0%
Resources & Access
Enrollment
410
210 below CA avg (~620)
Free/Reduced Lunch
61%
3pp below CA avg (64%)
Student-Teacher Ratio
22:1
1 more students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$23,520
District avg: $16,506 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
Teacher Salary Range
$73,812 – $139,067
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At Ida Jew Academies in San Jose, 27.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ida Jew Academies trails its district average for low-income students by 1.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (29.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 21.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 189 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Absenteeism · Homeless+9.7pp
27.4% vs 17.7% overall · n=73
ELA · English Learner−21.7pp
9.4% vs 31.1% overall · n=102
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · English Learner−11.0pp
0.9% vs 11.9% overall · n=102
Math · English Learner−18.9pp
7.5% vs 26.4% overall · n=105
Math Exceeded · English Learner−11.0pp
0.0% vs 11.0% overall · n=105

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income189 tested
ELA 27.5%·Math 23.8%· -1.7pp vs district
Hispanic250 tested
ELA 29.6%·Math 24.0%· +2.8pp vs district
English Learner105 tested
ELA 8.8%·Math 7.6%· -2.6pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 17.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: -1.8pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 58%Support 38%Other 4%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$159K
$74K above CA median
Median Home Value
$1.16M
$506K above CA median
Bachelor's+
40%
5pp above CA avg
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
11.2 years avg experience
33 teachers · 18% first-year · 9% second-year
Teacher Credentials
99% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

5-year trend

4530'19'22'23'24'25
↓ 14.4 points since 2019
Rank: #2826 → #2936 → #3877 → #4124 → #4036Exceeded: 11% → 6% → 5% → 7% → 9%
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · No testing 2020–21 (COVID) · Scope Score based on CAASPP, absenteeism & suspension data

How Ida Jew Academies compares

Ida Jew Academies vs. California averages — 2025 CAASPP data
MetricThis schoolCA avg
Exceeded Standard8.7%21.6%
Met or Exceeded22.7%42.9%
Chronic Absenteeism17.7%18.1%
Suspension Rate1.2%1.7%
Cohort GrowthBelow avgAverage

Source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025 · Analyzed by SchoolScope

Grade trajectory

How proficiency compares across grade levels this year (different students, same test year)

ELA Trajectory
29.3%21.6%G3G4G5
Math Trajectory
31.7%18.9%G3G4G5

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
3rd4114.6%14.6%17.1%53.7%29.3%
4th464.3%13.0%13.0%69.6%17.4%
5th3716.2%5.4%16.2%62.2%21.6%
6th6010.0%13.3%36.7%40.0%23.3%
7th5514.6%38.2%23.6%23.6%52.7%
8th4311.6%30.2%34.9%23.3%41.9%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
3rd417.3%24.4%26.8%41.5%31.7%
4th464.3%13.0%23.9%58.7%17.4%
5th375.4%13.5%16.2%64.9%18.9%
6th633.2%9.5%30.2%57.1%12.7%
7th5520.0%16.4%25.4%38.2%36.4%
8th4325.6%16.3%27.9%30.2%41.9%

Science scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
5th807.5%17.5%57.5%17.5%25.0%

80 students tested · CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually like ELA/Math. Not included in the Scope Score. · Data source: CDE CAST 2025

Schools nearby

Frequently asked questions

Is Ida Jew Academies a good elementary school?
Ida Jew Academies has a Scope Score of 30 out of 100, placing it in the 23rd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,036 statewide. 8.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 12.9 percentage points below the California average of 21.6%. The Scope Score weights five dimensions: the exceeded-vs-met split (45%), proficiency (25%), grade-level growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Ida Jew Academies's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 22.7% of students at Ida Jew Academies met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 8.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 14.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 8.7% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 248 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Ida Jew Academies rank in California?
Ida Jew Academies ranks #4,036 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 23rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Ida Jew Academies getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Ida Jew Academies decreases by 10.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Ida Jew Academies?
17.7% of students at Ida Jew Academies are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.1%. The suspension rate is 1.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Ida Jew Academies compare to other schools in San Jose?
Ida Jew Academies scores 30/100 (23rd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 410 students. Use the schools in San Jose page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Ida Jew Academies serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Ida Jew Academies in San Jose, 27.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ida Jew Academies trails its district average for low-income students by 1.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (29.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 21.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 189 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

See something that doesn’t look right?

Report a data issue

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog