ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Grand Oaks Elementary

Grades K-52024–25 data
Developing
36/100
Developing — 37th percentile statewide
#3,278 of 5,230 CA elementary schools
↑ 8.8 pts since 2019
📈 On the Rise

On an upward trajectory — scores are improving faster than average. Worth a closer look. Additional resources are fueling an upward trend

School Climate
80% of students attend consistently
Chronic absenteeism: 19.7% (state avg: 18.1%)
"Attend consistently" means missing ≤10% of school days (the chronic absenteeism threshold).
Moderate suspension rate
2.9% suspension rate (state avg: 1.7%)
Share of students who received at least one suspension during the year.
Source: California Dept. of Education, 2024–25See breakdown by student group →

What the numbers actually mean

Most rating sites report "31% proficient" and stop there. We think that number deserves more context — here's what we found when we looked deeper:

10.2% of students exceeded standard? Level 4 on California's CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment — the state defines four levels: Not Met, Nearly Met, Met, and Exceeded. while 20.6% met it. That exceeded rate is 11.4 points below the state average of 21.6%. That's 2.7 points below the Gateway Unified district average of 12.9%. The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

Grand Oaks Elementary
10%
21%
California average
22%
21%
ExceededMet onlyBelow

We tracked the same cohort across years (2023 G3 → 2025 G5): students gained 93 scale score points? Pseudo-cohort tracking: we compare this school's G3 class from a prior year to the G5 class in the current year. Same school, same cohort aged forward. Uses SBAC scale scores designed for cross-year comparison., suggesting this school is adding measurable value over time.

SchoolScope cohort tracking · Same cohort tracked across years using SBAC scale scores — stronger than single-year cross-grade comparison

Chronic absenteeism? Missing 10%+ of enrolled school days. This is an official California Dashboard accountability indicator. is 19.7%, above the state average of 18.1%.

Data you won't find on other sites: School-level per-pupil spending (not just district averages) · Current-year 2025 data direct from CDE · The exceeded vs. met split that most rating sites collapse into one number

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters → · Scope Score is SchoolScope's analysis of CDE data — not an official CDE rating. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

No single score captures a school. This is a starting point — visit, ask questions, trust your instincts.

What this score doesn't capture
  • — Teaching quality, classroom culture, and how teachers connect with students
  • — Arts, athletics, extracurriculars, and enrichment programs
  • — How well the school serves students with IEPs or gifted learners
  • — Parent community engagement and satisfaction
  • — Whether the curriculum aligns with your family's values

Most of our data is updated once per year and may reflect the prior school year.


Before you visit
Questions worth asking and signals worth checking
Who this school is great for
Families prioritizing upward trajectory — proficiency improves 11.3pp G3→G5
Families who value a smaller school community — 315 students
Worth checking: Families wanting top-end academic rigor — more students meet the bar (21%) than exceed it (10%)
These reflect data patterns, not guarantees. Your child's experience will depend on their teacher, grade, and classroom — things no score captures.

Score Factors
Academic Performance
Growth (G3→G5): +11.3pp
Scores improve across grades (state avg -3.0pp)
15% weight

Growth measures what the school adds, not what families bring. When available, we track the same cohort across years for a stronger signal.

Limitation: Cohort tracking is school-level (not individual students) — transfers and demographic shifts can affect results. Falls back to cross-sectional comparison when historical data is unavailable.

SchoolScope derived
Holding back
Exceeded standard: 10.2%
11.4pp below state avg (state avg 21.6%)
43% weight

Exceeded rate gets the highest weight because it separates schools that clear the bar from those that raise it.

Limitation: Reflects tested students only — opt-out rates are not published by CDE.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Met or exceeded: 30.8%
12.1pp below state avg (state avg 42.9%)
22% weight

Overall proficiency provides the broadest measure of academic achievement.

Limitation: Combines ‘met’ and ‘exceeded’ — the gap between them matters more than either alone.

CDE CAASPP 2025
School Climate
Holding back
Chronic absenteeism: 19.7%
1.5pp above state avg (state avg 18.1%)
10% weight

Absenteeism reflects school culture and family engagement — an official CA Dashboard accountability indicator.

Limitation: 10% threshold is the same for all schools regardless of demographics or geography.

CDE Attendance 2025
Suspension rate: 2.9%
1.2pp above state avg (state avg 1.7%)
5% weight

Low suspension rates correlate with positive school culture and restorative practices.

Limitation: Schools may differ in reporting practices — some underreport to improve metrics.

CDE Discipline 2025
We make judgment calls about what matters. We believe exceeded scores reveal more than proficiency alone, and that growth matters more than raw test results. Reasonable people could weight these differently — and that's fine. The factors above show exactly what we weighted and why, so you can decide where you agree and where you'd adjust. The elementary Scope Score uses 5 dimensions. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

The Scope Score emphasizes academic performance. It weights test proficiency, the exceeded-vs-met gap, and growth trajectory most heavily. If your family prioritizes arts, athletics, school culture, or teaching philosophy, this score captures some of that indirectly (through absenteeism and suspension) but not all of it. Different families should weight these dimensions differently — the score factors above let you see exactly what drives this number.

How to use this
  • Use for long-term academic patterns, not this week's classroom experience
  • Verify with a recent visit — scores can't capture a school mid-transformation
  • Combine with local context — talk to parents, attend a school board meeting, trust your gut

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic13.7%
White69.8%
Asian1.6%
Black0.6%
Other14.3%
GenderFemale 42.9%Male 57.1%
Resources & Access
Enrollment
315
165 below CA avg (~480)
Free/Reduced Lunch
83%
19pp above CA avg (64%)
Student-Teacher Ratio
21:1
0 fewer students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$22,103
District avg: $16,199 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
Teacher Salary Range
$53,647 – $111,715
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At Grand Oaks Elementary in Shasta Lake, 35.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 36.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Grand Oaks Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 1.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.6% Math proficient); White students (29.2% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 127 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Absenteeism · Hispanic+4.4pp
24.1% vs 19.7% overall · n=54

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income127 tested
ELA 35.4%·Math 27.6%· -1.5pp vs district
White96 tested
ELA 29.2%·Math 28.1%· -10.2pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 17.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.7pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 66%Support 31%Other 3%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$54K
$31K below CA median
Median Home Value
$244K
$415K below CA median
Bachelor's+
14%
21pp below CA avg
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
12.7 years avg experience
19 teachers · 21% first-year
Teacher Credentials
100% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

5-year trend

2736'19'22'23'24'25
↑ 8.8 points since 2019
Rank: #4212 → #2781 → #2568 → #2692 → #3278Exceeded: 9% → 17% → 14% → 13% → 10%
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · No testing 2020–21 (COVID) · Scope Score based on CAASPP, absenteeism & suspension data

How Grand Oaks Elementary compares

Grand Oaks Elementary vs. California averages — 2025 CAASPP data
MetricThis schoolCA avg
Exceeded Standard10.2%21.6%
Met or Exceeded30.8%42.9%
Chronic Absenteeism19.7%18.1%
Suspension Rate2.9%1.7%
Cohort GrowthStrongAverage

Source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025 · Analyzed by SchoolScope

Grade trajectory

How proficiency compares across grade levels this year (different students, same test year)

ELA Trajectory
21.4%41.2%G3G4G5
Math Trajectory
28.6%31.4%G3G4G5

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
3rd565.4%16.1%28.6%50.0%21.4%
4th4012.5%25.0%15.0%47.5%37.5%
5th5115.7%25.5%21.6%37.3%41.2%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
3rd568.9%19.6%25.0%46.4%28.6%
4th405.0%20.0%35.0%40.0%25.0%
5th5113.7%17.6%31.4%37.3%31.4%

Science scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
5th513.9%21.6%60.8%13.7%25.5%

51 students tested · CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually like ELA/Math. Not included in the Scope Score. · Data source: CDE CAST 2025

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Grand Oaks Elementary
36/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Schools nearby

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


Frequently asked questions

Is Grand Oaks Elementary a good elementary school?
Grand Oaks Elementary has a Scope Score of 36 out of 100, placing it in the 37th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,278 statewide. 10.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 11.4 percentage points below the California average of 21.6%. The Scope Score weights five dimensions: the exceeded-vs-met split (45%), proficiency (25%), grade-level growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Grand Oaks Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 30.8% of students at Grand Oaks Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 20.6% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 294 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Grand Oaks Elementary rank in California?
Grand Oaks Elementary ranks #3,278 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 37th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Grand Oaks Elementary getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Grand Oaks Elementary increases by 11.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Grand Oaks Elementary?
19.7% of students at Grand Oaks Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.1%. The suspension rate is 2.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Grand Oaks Elementary compare to other schools in Shasta Lake?
Grand Oaks Elementary scores 36/100 (37th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 315 students. Use the schools in Shasta Lake page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Grand Oaks Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Grand Oaks Elementary in Shasta Lake, 35.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 36.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Grand Oaks Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 1.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.6% Math proficient); White students (29.2% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 127 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

See something that doesn’t look right?

Report a data issue

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog