ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

George Washington Charter

Grades K-5Charter2024–25 data
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
Solid
60/100
Solid — 82nd percentile statewide
#941 of 5,230 CA elementary schools
↓ 17.8 pts since 2019
💪 Strong All-Around

Strong across every dimension we measure — academics, growth, culture, and engagement. Well-balanced performance on a modest budget

School Climate
89% of students attend consistently
Chronic absenteeism: 10.8% (state avg: 18.1%)
"Attend consistently" means missing ≤10% of school days (the chronic absenteeism threshold).
Minimal suspensions
1.2% suspension rate (state avg: 1.7%)
Share of students who received at least one suspension during the year.
Source: California Dept. of Education, 2024–25See breakdown by student group →

What the numbers actually mean

Most rating sites report "68% proficient" and stop there. We think that number deserves more context — here's what we found when we looked deeper:

37.9% of students exceeded standard? Level 4 on California's CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment — the state defines four levels: Not Met, Nearly Met, Met, and Exceeded. while 30.5% met it. That exceeded rate is 16.3 points above the state average of 21.6%. That's 24.8 points above the Desert Sands Unified district average of 13.1%. The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

George Washington Charter
38%
30%
California average
22%
21%
ExceededMet onlyBelow

We tracked the same cohort across years (2023 G3 → 2025 G5): students gained 66 scale score points? Pseudo-cohort tracking: we compare this school's G3 class from a prior year to the G5 class in the current year. Same school, same cohort aged forward. Uses SBAC scale scores designed for cross-year comparison., suggesting this school is adding measurable value over time.

SchoolScope cohort tracking · Same cohort tracked across years using SBAC scale scores — stronger than single-year cross-grade comparison

Chronic absenteeism? Missing 10%+ of enrolled school days. This is an official California Dashboard accountability indicator. is 10.8%, better than the state average of 18.1%.

Data you won't find on other sites: School-level per-pupil spending (not just district averages) · Current-year 2025 data direct from CDE · The exceeded vs. met split that most rating sites collapse into one number

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters → · Scope Score is SchoolScope's analysis of CDE data — not an official CDE rating. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

No single score captures a school. This is a starting point — visit, ask questions, trust your instincts.

What this score doesn't capture
  • — Teaching quality, classroom culture, and how teachers connect with students
  • — Arts, athletics, extracurriculars, and enrichment programs
  • — How well the school serves students with IEPs or gifted learners
  • — Parent community engagement and satisfaction
  • — Whether the curriculum aligns with your family's values

Most of our data is updated once per year and may reflect the prior school year.


Before you visit
Questions worth asking and signals worth checking
Who this school is great for
Families where consistent attendance and school culture matter — absenteeism is well below state average
Families looking for a low-discipline-incident environment
Worth checking: Students needing sustained momentum — proficiency dips between grades
These reflect data patterns, not guarantees. Your child's experience will depend on their teacher, grade, and classroom — things no score captures.

Score Factors
Academic Performance
Exceeded standard: 37.9%
16.3pp above state avg (state avg 21.6%)
43% weight

Exceeded rate gets the highest weight because it separates schools that clear the bar from those that raise it.

Limitation: Reflects tested students only — opt-out rates are not published by CDE.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Met or exceeded: 68.4%
25.4pp above state avg (state avg 42.9%)
22% weight

Overall proficiency provides the broadest measure of academic achievement.

Limitation: Combines ‘met’ and ‘exceeded’ — the gap between them matters more than either alone.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Growth (G3→G5): -1.2pp
Scores decline across grades (state avg -3.0pp)
15% weight

Growth measures what the school adds, not what families bring. When available, we track the same cohort across years for a stronger signal.

Limitation: Cohort tracking is school-level (not individual students) — transfers and demographic shifts can affect results. Falls back to cross-sectional comparison when historical data is unavailable.

SchoolScope derived
School Climate
Chronic absenteeism: 10.8%
7.3pp below state avg (state avg 18.1%)
10% weight

Absenteeism reflects school culture and family engagement — an official CA Dashboard accountability indicator.

Limitation: 10% threshold is the same for all schools regardless of demographics or geography.

CDE Attendance 2025
Suspension rate: 1.2%
0.4pp below state avg (state avg 1.7%)
5% weight

Low suspension rates correlate with positive school culture and restorative practices.

Limitation: Schools may differ in reporting practices — some underreport to improve metrics.

CDE Discipline 2025
We make judgment calls about what matters. We believe exceeded scores reveal more than proficiency alone, and that growth matters more than raw test results. Reasonable people could weight these differently — and that's fine. The factors above show exactly what we weighted and why, so you can decide where you agree and where you'd adjust. The elementary Scope Score uses 5 dimensions. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

The Scope Score emphasizes academic performance. It weights test proficiency, the exceeded-vs-met gap, and growth trajectory most heavily. If your family prioritizes arts, athletics, school culture, or teaching philosophy, this score captures some of that indirectly (through absenteeism and suspension) but not all of it. Different families should weight these dimensions differently — the score factors above let you see exactly what drives this number.

How to use this
  • Use for long-term academic patterns, not this week's classroom experience
  • Verify with a recent visit — scores can't capture a school mid-transformation
  • Combine with local context — talk to parents, attend a school board meeting, trust your gut

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic35.2%
White49.6%
Asian5.3%
Black1.5%
Other8.5%
GenderFemale 50.1%Male 49.9%
Resources & Access
Enrollment
756
276 above CA avg (~480)
Free/Reduced Lunch
51%
13pp below CA avg (64%)
Student-Teacher Ratio
25:1
4 more students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$13,402
District avg: $13,985 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
Teacher Salary Range
$63,775 – $132,451
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At George Washington Charter in Palm Desert, 61.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 35.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. George Washington Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 26.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (57.2% Math proficient); White students (74.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 31.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 187 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Suspension · Disabilities+4.2pp
5.4% vs 1.2% overall · n=92
ELA · Disabilities−31.9pp
37.5% vs 69.4% overall · n=16
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · Disabilities−22.1pp
18.8% vs 40.8% overall · n=16
Math · Disabilities−29.9pp
37.5% vs 67.4% overall · n=16
Math Exceeded · Disabilities−28.7pp
6.3% vs 35.0% overall · n=16

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income187 tested
ELA 61.5%·Math 57.2%· +26.4pp vs district
White186 tested
ELA 74.2%·Math 70.4%· +12.2pp vs district
Hispanic128 tested
ELA 57.0%·Math 57.8%· +21.3pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 2.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 62%Support 35%Other 3%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$69K
$16K below CA median
Median Home Value
$424K
$235K below CA median
Bachelor's+
40%
5pp above CA avg
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
15.4 years avg experience
36 teachers · 6% first-year
Teacher Credentials
97% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

5-year trend

7860'19'22'23'24'25
↓ 17.8 points since 2019
Rank: #668 → #993 → #954 → #785 → #941Exceeded: 43% → 35% → 41% → 39% → 38%
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · No testing 2020–21 (COVID) · Scope Score based on CAASPP, absenteeism & suspension data

How George Washington Charter compares

George Washington Charter vs. California averages — 2025 CAASPP data
MetricThis schoolCA avg
Exceeded Standard37.9%21.6%
Met or Exceeded68.4%42.9%
Chronic Absenteeism10.8%18.1%
Suspension Rate1.2%1.7%
Cohort GrowthBelow avgAverage

Source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025 · Analyzed by SchoolScope

Grade trajectory

How proficiency compares across grade levels this year (different students, same test year)

ELA Trajectory
65.6%70.6%G3G4G5
Math Trajectory
69.6%62.2%G3G4G5

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
3rd12536.0%29.6%14.4%20.0%65.6%
4th12845.3%26.6%20.3%7.8%71.9%
5th11941.2%29.4%20.2%9.2%70.6%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
3rd12532.0%37.6%18.4%12.0%69.6%
4th12835.2%35.2%22.7%7.0%70.3%
5th11937.8%24.4%26.1%11.8%62.2%

Science scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
5th11933.6%31.1%32.8%2.5%64.7%

119 students tested · CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually like ELA/Math. Not included in the Scope Score. · Data source: CDE CAST 2025

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
George Washington CharterCharter
60/100
This school

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

Schools nearby

Frequently asked questions

Is George Washington Charter a good elementary school?
George Washington Charter has a Scope Score of 60 out of 100, placing it in the 82nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #941 statewide. 37.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 16.3 percentage points above the California average of 21.6%. The Scope Score weights five dimensions: the exceeded-vs-met split (45%), proficiency (25%), grade-level growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are George Washington Charter's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 68.4% of students at George Washington Charter met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 37.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 30.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 37.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 744 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does George Washington Charter rank in California?
George Washington Charter ranks #941 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 82nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is George Washington Charter getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at George Washington Charter decreases by 1.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at George Washington Charter?
10.8% of students at George Washington Charter are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.1%. The suspension rate is 1.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does George Washington Charter compare to other schools in Palm Desert?
George Washington Charter scores 60/100 (82nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 756 students. Use the schools in Palm Desert page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does George Washington Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At George Washington Charter in Palm Desert, 61.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 35.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. George Washington Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 26.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (57.2% Math proficient); White students (74.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 31.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 187 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

See something that doesn’t look right?

Report a data issue

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog