ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Foothills Middle

Grades 6-82024–25 data
Arcadia UnifiedArcadia, Los Angeles County91006
📍 171 East Sycamore Avenue📞 (626) 821-8363
Strong
70/100
Strong — 92nd percentile statewide
#130 of 1,714 CA middle schools
↓ 21.8 pts since 2019
🌱 Building Momentum

Every school has strengths the data doesn’t fully capture. Visit and see for yourself. Resources alone aren't driving results yet — deeper challenges may be at play

School Climate
94% of students attend consistently
Chronic absenteeism: 5.7% (state avg: 19.1%)
"Attend consistently" means missing ≤10% of school days (the chronic absenteeism threshold).
Moderate suspension rate
2.4% suspension rate (state avg: 4.2%)
Share of students who received at least one suspension during the year.
Source: California Dept. of Education, 2024–25See breakdown by student group →

What the numbers actually mean

Most rating sites report "73% proficient" and stop there. We think that number deserves more context — here's what we found when we looked deeper:

46.3% of students exceeded standard? Level 4 on California's CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment — the state defines four levels: Not Met, Nearly Met, Met, and Exceeded. while 27.2% met it. That exceeded rate is 28.9 points above the state average of 17.3%. That's near the Arcadia Unified district average of 44.6%. The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Foothills Middle
46%
27%
California average
17%
22%
ExceededMet onlyBelow

We tracked the same cohort across years (2023 G6 → 2025 G8): students gained 39 scale score points? Pseudo-cohort tracking: we compare this school's G6 class from a prior year to the G8 class in the current year. Same school, same cohort aged forward. Uses SBAC scale scores designed for cross-year comparison., suggesting this school is adding measurable value over time.

SchoolScope cohort tracking · Same cohort tracked across years using SBAC scale scores — stronger than single-year cross-grade comparison

California's Dashboard shows ELA performance increased and Math increased year-over-year. 21.9% of English learners reached Level 4 (Well Developed) on ELPAC.

Chronic absenteeism? Missing 10%+ of enrolled school days. This is an official California Dashboard accountability indicator. is 5.7%, better than the state average of 19.1%.

CDE Attendance 2025

Data you won't find on other sites: School-level per-pupil spending (not just district averages) · Current-year 2025 data direct from CDE · The exceeded vs. met split that most rating sites collapse into one number

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters → · Scope Score is SchoolScope's analysis of CDE data — not an official CDE rating. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

No single score captures a school. This is a starting point — visit, ask questions, trust your instincts.

▸ What this score doesn't capture
  • — Teaching quality, classroom culture, and how teachers connect with students
  • — Arts, athletics, extracurriculars, and enrichment programs
  • — How well the school serves students with IEPs or gifted learners
  • — Parent community engagement and satisfaction
  • — Whether the curriculum aligns with your family's values

Most of our data is updated once per year and may reflect the prior school year.

Before you visit
Questions worth asking and signals worth checking
What to verify
⚠Score is solid but proficiency rates dropped 3.3 points from G6 to G8. Strong overall, but fewer students hit the benchmark in later grades — could reflect harder standards, cohort differences, or a curriculum gap worth asking about.
Who this school is great for
✓Students already performing at or above grade level — 46% of students here push past the standard
✓Families where consistent attendance and school culture matter — absenteeism is well below state average
△Worth checking: Students needing sustained momentum — proficiency dips between grades
These reflect data patterns, not guarantees. Your child's experience will depend on their teacher, grade, and classroom — things no score captures.
Score Factors
Academic Performance
✓Exceeded standard: 46.3%
28.9pp above state avg (state avg 17.3%)
43% weight

Exceeded rate gets the highest weight because it separates schools that clear the bar from those that raise it.

Limitation: Reflects tested students only — opt-out rates are not published by CDE.

CDE CAASPP 2025
✓Met or exceeded: 73.4%
33.9pp above state avg (state avg 39.5%)
22% weight

Overall proficiency provides the broadest measure of academic achievement.

Limitation: Combines ‘met’ and ‘exceeded’ — the gap between them matters more than either alone.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Holding back
▼Growth (G6→G8): -3.3pp
Scores decline across grades (state avg +0.8pp)
15% weight

Growth measures what the school adds, not what families bring. When available, we track the same cohort across years for a stronger signal.

Limitation: Cohort tracking is school-level (not individual students) — transfers and demographic shifts can affect results. Falls back to cross-sectional comparison when historical data is unavailable.

SchoolScope derived
School Climate
✓Chronic absenteeism: 5.7%
13.4pp below state avg (state avg 19.1%)
10% weight

Absenteeism reflects school culture and family engagement — an official CA Dashboard accountability indicator.

Limitation: 10% threshold is the same for all schools regardless of demographics or geography.

CDE Attendance 2025
✓Suspension rate: 2.4%
1.8pp below state avg (state avg 4.2%)
5% weight

Low suspension rates correlate with positive school culture and restorative practices.

Limitation: Schools may differ in reporting practices — some underreport to improve metrics.

CDE Discipline 2025
✓EL proficiency (ELPAC): 21.9%
5.1pp above state avg (state avg 16.8%)
5% weight

ELPAC Level 4 measures how well a school develops English proficiency — a school-quality signal for its EL population.

Limitation: Only available for schools with English Learner students. Weight redistributes to other dimensions when not applicable.

CDE ELPAC 2025
We make judgment calls about what matters. We believe exceeded scores reveal more than proficiency alone, and that growth matters more than raw test results. Reasonable people could weight these differently — and that's fine. The factors above show exactly what we weighted and why, so you can decide where you agree and where you'd adjust. The middle school Scope Score uses 6 dimensions. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

The Scope Score emphasizes academic performance. It weights test proficiency, the exceeded-vs-met gap, and growth trajectory most heavily. If your family prioritizes arts, athletics, school culture, or teaching philosophy, this score captures some of that indirectly (through absenteeism and suspension) but not all of it. Different families should weight these dimensions differently — the score factors above let you see exactly what drives this number.

How to use this
  • –Use for long-term academic patterns, not this week's classroom experience
  • –Verify with a recent visit — scores can't capture a school mid-transformation
  • –Combine with local context — talk to parents, attend a school board meeting, trust your gut
Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic18.7%
White10.7%
Asian60.4%
Black0.7%
Other9.5%
GenderFemale 47.8%Male 52.2%
Resources & Access
Enrollment
684
176 below CA avg (~860)
Free/Reduced Lunch
29%
35pp below CA avg (64%)
Student-Teacher Ratio
24:1
3 more students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$16,646
District avg: $12,687 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
21.9% Level 4
Share of English Learners reaching full proficiency
Teacher Salary Range
$76,742 – $152,165
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At Foothills Middle in Arcadia, 69.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 62.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Foothills Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (61.3% Math proficient); Asian students (81.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 57.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 165 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Absenteeism · Disabilities+9.4pp
15.1% vs 5.7% overall · n=53
Suspension · Disabilities+6.7pp
9.1% vs 2.4% overall · n=55
ELA · English Learner−57.3pp
17.9% vs 75.1% overall · n=37
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · English Learner−41.8pp
0.0% vs 41.8% overall · n=37
Math · Disabilities−49.6pp
22.0% vs 71.6% overall · n=37
Math Exceeded · Disabilities−44.3pp
6.3% vs 50.6% overall · n=37

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income168 tested
ELA 69.7%·Math 61.3%· +7.5pp vs district
Asian403 tested
ELA 81.5%·Math 80.6%· +3.9pp vs district
Hispanic115 tested
ELA 53.0%·Math 40.0%· +1.7pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 6.7pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +6.1pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 66%Support 32%Other 2%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$123K
$38K above CA median
Median Home Value
$1.15M
$495K above CA median
Bachelor's+
52%
17pp above CA avg
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
19.0 years avg experience
29 teachers
Teacher Credentials
94% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

5-year trend

9270'19'22'23'24'25
↓ 21.8 points since 2019
Rank: #10 → #104 → #126 → #122 → #130Exceeded: 55% → 45% → 46% → 43% → 46%
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · No testing 2020–21 (COVID) · Scope Score based on CAASPP, absenteeism & suspension data

How Foothills Middle compares

Foothills Middle vs. California averages — 2025 CAASPP data
MetricThis schoolCA avg
Exceeded Standard46.3%17.3%
Met or Exceeded73.4%39.5%
Chronic Absenteeism5.7%19.1%
Suspension Rate2.4%4.2%
Cohort GrowthAverageAverage

Source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025 · Analyzed by SchoolScope

Grade trajectory

How proficiency compares across grade levels this year (different students, same test year)

ELA Trajectory
73.0%73.4%G6G7G8
Math Trajectory
74.9%67.9%G6G7G8

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th18540.5%32.4%20.5%6.5%73.0%
7th19745.7%33.5%12.2%8.6%79.2%
8th24439.3%34.0%14.8%11.9%73.4%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th18752.4%22.5%18.2%7.0%74.9%
7th20253.0%19.3%16.3%11.4%72.3%
8th24946.6%21.3%18.5%13.7%67.9%

Science scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
8th25026.0%35.6%32.8%5.6%61.6%

250 students tested · CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually like ELA/Math. Not included in the Scope Score. · Data source: CDE CAST 2025

K-12 Feeder Path
▼
High School

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Schools nearby

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

High Point Academy
Kinneloa Canyon Rd · Nonsectarian · Grades Pre-K-8 · 348 students
10:1Private4 mi
Clairbourn School
Huntington Dr · Nonsectarian · Grades Pre-K-8 · 234 students
10:1Private3.8 mi
Walden School
S San Gabriel Blvd · Nonsectarian · Grades Pre-K-6 · 154 students
10:1Private3.9 mi
Barnhart School
W Colorado Blvd · Nonsectarian · Grades Pre-K-8 · 126 students
8:1Private0.9 mi
Arroyo Pacific Academy
N Santa Anita Ave · Nonsectarian · Grades Pre-K-12 · 123 students
10:1Private0.7 mi

Frequently asked questions

Is Foothills Middle a good middle school?
Foothills Middle has a Scope Score of 70 out of 100, placing it in the 92nd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #130 statewide. 46.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 28.9 percentage points above the California average of 17.3%. The Scope Score weights five dimensions: the exceeded-vs-met split (45%), proficiency (25%), grade-level growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Foothills Middle's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 73.4% of students at Foothills Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 46.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 27.2% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 46.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,264 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Foothills Middle rank in California?
Foothills Middle ranks #130 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 92nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Foothills Middle getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Foothills Middle decreases by 3.3 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Foothills Middle?
5.7% of students at Foothills Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 19.1%. The suspension rate is 2.4%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Foothills Middle compare to other schools in Arcadia?
Foothills Middle scores 70/100 (92nd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 684 students. Use the schools in Arcadia page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.
How does Foothills Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Foothills Middle in Arcadia, 69.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 62.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Foothills Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (61.3% Math proficient); Asian students (81.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 57.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 165 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
← Browse all schoolsDownload CSV

See something that doesn’t look right?

Report a data issue

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog