ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Solid
52/100
Solid — 72nd percentile statewide
#1,455 of 5,230 CA elementary schools
↑ 26.5 pts since 2019
🌱 Building Momentum

Every school has strengths the data doesn’t fully capture. Visit and see for yourself. Resources alone aren't driving results yet — deeper challenges may be at play

School Climate
83% of students attend consistently
Chronic absenteeism: 16.6% (state avg: 18.1%)
"Attend consistently" means missing ≤10% of school days (the chronic absenteeism threshold).
Moderate suspension rate
2.2% suspension rate (state avg: 1.7%)
Share of students who received at least one suspension during the year.
Source: California Dept. of Education, 2024–25See breakdown by student group →

What the numbers actually mean

Most rating sites report "54% proficient" and stop there. We think that number deserves more context — here's what we found when we looked deeper:

20.1% of students exceeded standard? Level 4 on California's CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment — the state defines four levels: Not Met, Nearly Met, Met, and Exceeded. while 34.3% met it. That exceeded rate is near the state average of 21.6%. The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

Chicago Park Elementary
20%
34%
California average
22%
21%
ExceededMet onlyBelow

We tracked the same cohort across years (2023 G3 → 2025 G5): students gained 116 scale score points? Pseudo-cohort tracking: we compare this school's G3 class from a prior year to the G5 class in the current year. Same school, same cohort aged forward. Uses SBAC scale scores designed for cross-year comparison., suggesting this school is adding measurable value over time.

SchoolScope cohort tracking · Same cohort tracked across years using SBAC scale scores — stronger than single-year cross-grade comparison

Chronic absenteeism? Missing 10%+ of enrolled school days. This is an official California Dashboard accountability indicator. is 16.6%, better than the state average of 18.1%.

Data you won't find on other sites: School-level per-pupil spending (not just district averages) · Current-year 2025 data direct from CDE · The exceeded vs. met split that most rating sites collapse into one number

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters → · Scope Score is SchoolScope's analysis of CDE data — not an official CDE rating. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

No single score captures a school. This is a starting point — visit, ask questions, trust your instincts.

What this score doesn't capture
  • — Teaching quality, classroom culture, and how teachers connect with students
  • — Arts, athletics, extracurriculars, and enrichment programs
  • — How well the school serves students with IEPs or gifted learners
  • — Parent community engagement and satisfaction
  • — Whether the curriculum aligns with your family's values

Most of our data is updated once per year and may reflect the prior school year.


Before you visit
Questions worth asking and signals worth checking
What to verify
Score is solid but proficiency rates dropped 41.3 points from G3 to G5. Strong overall, but fewer students hit the benchmark in later grades — could reflect harder standards, cohort differences, or a curriculum gap worth asking about.
Who this school is great for
Families who value a smaller school community — 121 students
Worth checking: Families wanting top-end academic rigor — more students meet the bar (34%) than exceed it (20%); Students needing sustained momentum — proficiency dips between grades
These reflect data patterns, not guarantees. Your child's experience will depend on their teacher, grade, and classroom — things no score captures.

Score Factors
Academic Performance
Met or exceeded: 54.3%
11.4pp above state avg (state avg 42.9%)
22% weight

Overall proficiency provides the broadest measure of academic achievement.

Limitation: Combines ‘met’ and ‘exceeded’ — the gap between them matters more than either alone.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Holding back
Exceeded standard: 20.1%
1.5pp below state avg (state avg 21.6%)
43% weight

Exceeded rate gets the highest weight because it separates schools that clear the bar from those that raise it.

Limitation: Reflects tested students only — opt-out rates are not published by CDE.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Growth (G3→G5): -41.3pp
Scores decline across grades (state avg -3.0pp)
15% weight

Growth measures what the school adds, not what families bring. When available, we track the same cohort across years for a stronger signal.

Limitation: Cohort tracking is school-level (not individual students) — transfers and demographic shifts can affect results. Falls back to cross-sectional comparison when historical data is unavailable.

SchoolScope derived
School Climate
Chronic absenteeism: 16.6%
1.5pp below state avg (state avg 18.1%)
10% weight

Absenteeism reflects school culture and family engagement — an official CA Dashboard accountability indicator.

Limitation: 10% threshold is the same for all schools regardless of demographics or geography.

CDE Attendance 2025
Holding back
Suspension rate: 2.2%
0.6pp above state avg (state avg 1.7%)
5% weight

Low suspension rates correlate with positive school culture and restorative practices.

Limitation: Schools may differ in reporting practices — some underreport to improve metrics.

CDE Discipline 2025
We make judgment calls about what matters. We believe exceeded scores reveal more than proficiency alone, and that growth matters more than raw test results. Reasonable people could weight these differently — and that's fine. The factors above show exactly what we weighted and why, so you can decide where you agree and where you'd adjust. The elementary Scope Score uses 5 dimensions. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

The Scope Score emphasizes academic performance. It weights test proficiency, the exceeded-vs-met gap, and growth trajectory most heavily. If your family prioritizes arts, athletics, school culture, or teaching philosophy, this score captures some of that indirectly (through absenteeism and suspension) but not all of it. Different families should weight these dimensions differently — the score factors above let you see exactly what drives this number.

How to use this
  • Use for long-term academic patterns, not this week's classroom experience
  • Verify with a recent visit — scores can't capture a school mid-transformation
  • Combine with local context — talk to parents, attend a school board meeting, trust your gut

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic16.5%
White77.7%
Other5.8%
GenderFemale 46.3%Male 52.9%Non-binary 0.8%
Resources & Access
Enrollment
121
499 below CA avg (~620)
Free/Reduced Lunch
54%
10pp below CA avg (64%)
Student-Teacher Ratio
15:1
6 fewer students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$18,046
District avg: $11,359 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
At Chicago Park Elementary in Grass Valley, 56.5% of white students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 64.6% district-wide and 61.8% statewide. Chicago Park Elementary trails its district average for white students by 8.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: White students (43.5% Math proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 23 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Absenteeism · Low-Income+9.7pp
26.3% vs 16.6% overall · n=57
Suspension · Hispanic+5.8pp
8.0% vs 2.2% overall · n=25

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
White23 tested
ELA 56.5%·Math 43.5%· -8.1pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 54%Support 46%Other 1%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$60K
$25K below CA median
Median Home Value
$474K
$185K below CA median
Bachelor's+
32%
3pp below CA avg
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
11.4 years avg experience
14 teachers · 14% first-year · 14% second-year
Teacher Credentials
74% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

5-year trend

2652'19'22'23'24'25
↑ 26.5 points since 2019
Rank: #4295 → #1898 → #4138 → #3428 → #1455Exceeded: 13% → 21% → 10% → 13% → 20%
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · No testing 2020–21 (COVID) · Scope Score based on CAASPP, absenteeism & suspension data

How Chicago Park Elementary compares

Chicago Park Elementary vs. California averages — 2025 CAASPP data
MetricThis schoolCA avg
Exceeded Standard20.1%21.6%
Met or Exceeded54.3%42.9%
Chronic Absenteeism16.6%18.1%
Suspension Rate2.2%1.7%
Cohort GrowthStrongAverage

Source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025 · Analyzed by SchoolScope

Grade trajectory

How proficiency compares across grade levels this year (different students, same test year)

ELA Trajectory
77.8%43.8%G3G4G5
Math Trajectory
61.1%12.5%G3G4G5

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
3rd1850.0%27.8%11.1%11.1%77.8%
4th1323.1%46.1%30.8%0.0%69.2%
5th166.3%37.5%31.3%25.0%43.8%
6th8
7th8
8th9

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
3rd1833.3%27.8%22.2%16.7%61.1%
4th137.7%53.9%30.8%7.7%61.5%
5th160.0%12.5%68.8%18.8%12.5%
6th8
7th8
8th9

Science scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
5th258.0%24.0%68.0%0.0%32.0%

25 students tested · CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually like ELA/Math. Not included in the Scope Score. · Data source: CDE CAST 2025


Frequently asked questions

Is Chicago Park Elementary a good elementary school?
Chicago Park Elementary has a Scope Score of 52 out of 100, placing it in the 72nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,455 statewide. 20.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.6%. The Scope Score weights five dimensions: the exceeded-vs-met split (45%), proficiency (25%), grade-level growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Chicago Park Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 54.3% of students at Chicago Park Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 20.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 34.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 20.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 94 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Chicago Park Elementary rank in California?
Chicago Park Elementary ranks #1,455 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 72nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Chicago Park Elementary getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Chicago Park Elementary decreases by 41.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Chicago Park Elementary?
16.6% of students at Chicago Park Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.1%. The suspension rate is 2.2%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Chicago Park Elementary compare to other schools in Grass Valley?
Chicago Park Elementary scores 52/100 (72nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 121 students. Use the schools in Grass Valley page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Chicago Park Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Chicago Park Elementary in Grass Valley, 56.5% of white students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 64.6% district-wide and 61.8% statewide. Chicago Park Elementary trails its district average for white students by 8.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: White students (43.5% Math proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 23 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

See something that doesn’t look right?

Report a data issue

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog