ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Alexander Fleming Middle

Grades 6-82024–25 data
Los Angeles UnifiedLomita, Los Angeles County90717
📍 25425 Walnut Street📞 (310) 257-4500🌐 Website
Developing
43/100
Developing — 61st percentile statewide
#663 of 1,714 CA middle schools
↓ 9.4 pts since 2019
📈 On the Rise

On an upward trajectory — scores are improving faster than average. Worth a closer look. Additional resources are fueling an upward trend

School Climate
78% of students attend consistently
Chronic absenteeism: 22.4% (state avg: 19.1%)
"Attend consistently" means missing ≤10% of school days (the chronic absenteeism threshold).
Minimal suspensions
0.3% suspension rate (state avg: 4.2%)
Share of students who received at least one suspension during the year.
Source: California Dept. of Education, 2024–25See breakdown by student group →

What the numbers actually mean

Most rating sites report "42% proficient" and stop there. We think that number deserves more context — here's what we found when we looked deeper:

17.7% of students exceeded standard? Level 4 on California's CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment — the state defines four levels: Not Met, Nearly Met, Met, and Exceeded. while 23.8% met it. That exceeded rate is near the state average of 17.3%. That's near the Los Angeles Unified district average of 18.8%. The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

CDE CAASPP 2025
Alexander Fleming Middle
18%
24%
California average
17%
22%
ExceededMet onlyBelow

We tracked the same cohort across years (2023 G6 → 2025 G8): students gained 52 scale score points? Pseudo-cohort tracking: we compare this school's G6 class from a prior year to the G8 class in the current year. Same school, same cohort aged forward. Uses SBAC scale scores designed for cross-year comparison., suggesting this school is adding measurable value over time.

SchoolScope cohort tracking · Same cohort tracked across years using SBAC scale scores — stronger than single-year cross-grade comparison

California's Dashboard shows ELA performance increased significantly and Math increased year-over-year. 23.1% of English learners reached Level 4 (Well Developed) on ELPAC.

Chronic absenteeism? Missing 10%+ of enrolled school days. This is an official California Dashboard accountability indicator. is 22.4%, above the state average of 19.1%.

CDE Attendance 2025

Data you won't find on other sites: School-level per-pupil spending (not just district averages) · Current-year 2025 data direct from CDE · The exceeded vs. met split that most rating sites collapse into one number

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters → · Scope Score is SchoolScope's analysis of CDE data — not an official CDE rating. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

No single score captures a school. This is a starting point — visit, ask questions, trust your instincts.

▸ What this score doesn't capture
  • — Teaching quality, classroom culture, and how teachers connect with students
  • — Arts, athletics, extracurriculars, and enrichment programs
  • — How well the school serves students with IEPs or gifted learners
  • — Parent community engagement and satisfaction
  • — Whether the curriculum aligns with your family's values

Most of our data is updated once per year and may reflect the prior school year.

Before you visit
Questions worth asking and signals worth checking
Who this school is great for
✓Families prioritizing upward trajectory — proficiency improves 8.9pp G6→G8
✓Families looking for a low-discipline-incident environment
△Worth checking: Families wanting top-end academic rigor — more students meet the bar (24%) than exceed it (18%); Families sensitive to attendance culture — absenteeism is 3.3pp above state average; Families wanting small-class-size environments — this is a larger school
These reflect data patterns, not guarantees. Your child's experience will depend on their teacher, grade, and classroom — things no score captures.
Score Factors
Academic Performance
✓Exceeded standard: 17.7%
0.4pp above state avg (state avg 17.3%)
43% weight

Exceeded rate gets the highest weight because it separates schools that clear the bar from those that raise it.

Limitation: Reflects tested students only — opt-out rates are not published by CDE.

CDE CAASPP 2025
✓Met or exceeded: 41.5%
2.0pp above state avg (state avg 39.5%)
22% weight

Overall proficiency provides the broadest measure of academic achievement.

Limitation: Combines ‘met’ and ‘exceeded’ — the gap between them matters more than either alone.

CDE CAASPP 2025
✓Growth (G6→G8): +8.9pp
Scores improve across grades (state avg +0.8pp)
15% weight

Growth measures what the school adds, not what families bring. When available, we track the same cohort across years for a stronger signal.

Limitation: Cohort tracking is school-level (not individual students) — transfers and demographic shifts can affect results. Falls back to cross-sectional comparison when historical data is unavailable.

SchoolScope derived
School Climate
✓Suspension rate: 0.3%
4.0pp below state avg (state avg 4.2%)
5% weight

Low suspension rates correlate with positive school culture and restorative practices.

Limitation: Schools may differ in reporting practices — some underreport to improve metrics.

CDE Discipline 2025
✓EL proficiency (ELPAC): 23.1%
6.3pp above state avg (state avg 16.8%)
5% weight

ELPAC Level 4 measures how well a school develops English proficiency — a school-quality signal for its EL population.

Limitation: Only available for schools with English Learner students. Weight redistributes to other dimensions when not applicable.

CDE ELPAC 2025
Holding back
▼Chronic absenteeism: 22.4%
3.3pp above state avg (state avg 19.1%)
10% weight

Absenteeism reflects school culture and family engagement — an official CA Dashboard accountability indicator.

Limitation: 10% threshold is the same for all schools regardless of demographics or geography.

CDE Attendance 2025
We make judgment calls about what matters. We believe exceeded scores reveal more than proficiency alone, and that growth matters more than raw test results. Reasonable people could weight these differently — and that's fine. The factors above show exactly what we weighted and why, so you can decide where you agree and where you'd adjust. The middle school Scope Score uses 6 dimensions. How we built this score (and what it misses) →

The Scope Score emphasizes academic performance. It weights test proficiency, the exceeded-vs-met gap, and growth trajectory most heavily. If your family prioritizes arts, athletics, school culture, or teaching philosophy, this score captures some of that indirectly (through absenteeism and suspension) but not all of it. Different families should weight these dimensions differently — the score factors above let you see exactly what drives this number.

How to use this
  • –Use for long-term academic patterns, not this week's classroom experience
  • –Verify with a recent visit — scores can't capture a school mid-transformation
  • –Combine with local context — talk to parents, attend a school board meeting, trust your gut
Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic70.3%
White5.7%
Asian2.2%
Black14.3%
Other7.4%
GenderFemale 49.7%Male 50.3%
Resources & Access
Enrollment
1,122
262 above CA avg (~860)
Free/Reduced Lunch
88%
24pp above CA avg (64%)
Student-Teacher Ratio
18:1
3 fewer students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$20,532
District avg: $18,180 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
23.1% Level 4
Share of English Learners reaching full proficiency
Teacher Salary Range
$60,420 – $122,706
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At Alexander Fleming Middle in Lomita, 42.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Alexander Fleming Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (43.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 42.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 908 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Absenteeism · Homeless+26.1pp
48.5% vs 22.4% overall · n=33
ELA · English Learner−42.5pp
3.6% vs 46.1% overall · n=74
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · English Learner−15.3pp
0.0% vs 15.3% overall · n=74
Math · English Learner−27.5pp
9.5% vs 37.0% overall · n=94
Math Exceeded · Disabilities−16.9pp
3.2% vs 20.1% overall · n=155

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income924 tested
ELA 42.5%·Math 34.3%· +1.6pp vs district
Hispanic757 tested
ELA 43.8%·Math 36.6%· +2.8pp vs district
Disabilities155 tested
ELA 12.3%·Math 11.0%· -3.8pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 11.7pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.3pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 55%Support 40%Other 4%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$88K
$3K above CA median
Median Home Value
$732K
$73K above CA median
Bachelor's+
38%
3pp above CA avg
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
11.6 years avg experience
62 teachers · 2% first-year · 6% second-year
Teacher Credentials
85% fully credentialed
7.2% on intern/emergency permit

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

5-year trend

5243'19'22'23'24'25
↓ 9.4 points since 2019
Rank: #724 → #728 → #655 → #822 → #663Exceeded: 13% → 12% → 13% → 13% → 18%
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · No testing 2020–21 (COVID) · Scope Score based on CAASPP, absenteeism & suspension data

How Alexander Fleming Middle compares

Alexander Fleming Middle vs. California averages — 2025 CAASPP data
MetricThis schoolCA avg
Exceeded Standard17.7%17.3%
Met or Exceeded41.5%39.5%
Chronic Absenteeism22.4%19.1%
Suspension Rate0.3%4.2%
Cohort GrowthAbove avgAverage

Source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025 · Analyzed by SchoolScope

Grade trajectory

How proficiency compares across grade levels this year (different students, same test year)

ELA Trajectory
40%51.0%G6G7G8
Math Trajectory
33.6%40.5%G6G7G8

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th33511.6%28.4%31.0%29.0%40.0%
7th34516.8%30.4%25.5%27.3%47.3%
8th36117.4%33.5%20.5%28.5%51.0%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th33916.8%16.8%33.6%32.7%33.6%
7th35419.8%16.9%24.3%39.0%36.7%
8th36823.6%16.9%15.5%44.0%40.5%

Science scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
8th3745.1%16.0%64.2%14.7%21.1%

374 students tested · CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually like ELA/Math. Not included in the Scope Score. · Data source: CDE CAST 2025

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Schools nearby
All schools in Lomita →

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

Rolling Hills Country Day School
Crenshaw Blvd · Nonsectarian · Grades Pre-K-8 · 424 students
12:1Private2.4 mi
Rolling Hills Preparatory
Palos Verdes Dr N · Nonsectarian · Grades 1-12 · 217 students
6:1Private1.2 mi
Nishiyamato Academy of California
Lomita Blvd · Nonsectarian · Grades Pre-K-9 · 85 students
4:1Private1.2 mi
Switzer Learning Center
Amapola Ct · Nonsectarian · Grades 6-12 · 62 students
8:1Private3.6 mi
Fusion Palos Verdes
Deep Valley Dr Ste 250 · Nonsectarian · Grades 6-12 · 32 students
5:1Private3.8 mi

Frequently asked questions

Is Alexander Fleming Middle a good middle school?
Alexander Fleming Middle has a Scope Score of 43 out of 100, placing it in the 61st percentile of California middle schools and ranked #663 statewide. 17.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 17.3%. The Scope Score weights five dimensions: the exceeded-vs-met split (45%), proficiency (25%), grade-level growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Alexander Fleming Middle's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 41.5% of students at Alexander Fleming Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 17.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 17.7% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 2,102 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Alexander Fleming Middle rank in California?
Alexander Fleming Middle ranks #663 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 61st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Alexander Fleming Middle getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Alexander Fleming Middle increases by 8.9 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Alexander Fleming Middle?
22.4% of students at Alexander Fleming Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 19.1%. The suspension rate is 0.3%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Alexander Fleming Middle compare to other schools in Lomita?
Alexander Fleming Middle scores 43/100 (61st percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,122 students. Use the schools in Lomita page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.
How does Alexander Fleming Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Alexander Fleming Middle in Lomita, 42.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Alexander Fleming Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (43.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 42.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 908 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
← Browse all schoolsDownload CSV

See something that doesn’t look right?

Report a data issue

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog